
Good Bad Ugly (2025) Movie HDHub4u.tv
Good Bad Ugly, the highly anticipated Tamil action-crime drama of 2025, marks a significant collaboration between superstar Ajith Kumar and director Adhik. Released worldwide on 10 April 2025 in standard and EPIQ formats, this big-budget entertainer brings together an impressive ensemble cast including Trisha, Arjun, Jackie, Prasanna, Karthikrya, Redin, Yogi, and Simran.
Film Title: | Good Bad Ugly |
Directed By: | Adhik Ravichandran |
Genre: | Comedy, Action, Crime |
Launch Date: | 9 Apr 2025 |
Duration: | 2h 19m |
Main Cast: | Trisha Krishnan, Ajith Kumar, Arjun Das |
Leading Star: | Ajith Kumar |
Film Studio: | Mythri Movie Makers, T-Series |
Our Score: | 8/10 ratings |

The film was made on a reported production budget of up to ₹270 crore to ₹300 crore, and Ajith was reported to receive ₹150 crore as his remuneration. Produced by Mythri Movie Makers in collaboration with T-Series Films, the movie has been positioned as one of the biggest Tamil releases of 2025, carrying substantial expectations from both fans and the industry.
Good Bad Ugly Cast
Actor | Character |
---|---|
Priya Prakash Varrier | Nithya |
Arjun Das | Johnny / Jammy |
Jackie Shroff | Babel |
Simran | Priya |
Trisha Krishnan | Ramya |
Sunil Varma | ‘Baby’ Tyson |
Prasanna | Jaeger |
Ajith Kumar | AK ‘Red Dragon’ |
Karthikeya Dev | Vihaan |
Prabhu | Jayaprakash |





Plot and Storyline
The narrative follows AK, a powerful gangster who surrenders to the police, hoping that his wife and son will live a peaceful life. When he is released 17 years later, he learns that his son is falsely accused of serious crimes. To protect him, he is forced to go back to his old ways, facing enemies, both old and new. The story explores themes of redemption, family loyalty, and the inescapable nature of one’s past, presenting a familiar yet emotionally charged premise.
The plot structure follows a reformed criminal’s journey back into the underworld, driven by paternal instinct and protective love. The narrative attempts to balance action sequences with emotional moments, creating a storyline that appeals to both mass entertainment seekers and those looking for family drama elements. However, the execution seems to prioritize fan service over cohesive storytelling, which becomes evident in the mixed critical reception.
Cast Performance Analysis
Ajith Kumar delivers a performance that caters primarily to his fanbase, showcasing his screen presence and charisma. Several user reviews noted that the director used the full potential of the actor, indicating that Adhik successfully highlighted Ajith’s strengths as a performer. His portrayal of the reformed gangster carries the emotional weight of the story, though critics suggest that the role relies heavily on his star power rather than challenging acting requirements.
Arjun Das receives praise for nailing his role, bringing depth to his character as one of the antagonistic forces in the narrative. Trisha Krishnan continues her successful streak, with reviews noting her back-to-back blockbusters continue after Vidaamuyarchi. The supporting cast, including Jackie Shroff, Prasanna, and others, contribute effectively to the overall ensemble, though their characters appear to serve more functional purposes than offering significant dramatic depth.
Direction and Technical Aspects
Director Adhik Ravichandran’s approach has been described as fan-centric, which proves to be both the film’s strength and weakness. Critics noted that the director clearly intended to cater to Ajith fans and to some extent, he succeeds. But in doing so, he completely overlooks the importance of a cohesive script and engaging narrative. The direction prioritizes mass appeal moments and hero elevation sequences over narrative consistency.
The cinematography by Abinandhan Ramanujam provides visual appeal, though some reviews suggest that the technical execution, while competent, doesn’t elevate the material beyond its commercial intentions. The film’s pacing and structure seem designed more for theatrical impact than cinematic sophistication, reflecting the director’s clear focus on delivering fan-pleasing moments.
Critical Reception and Ratings
The film opened to mixed reviews from critics who noted that it struggled to balance homages to Ajith’s previous films with storytelling. The movie currently holds a 5.8 rating on IMDb, indicating moderate audience reception. Professional critics have been particularly divided in their assessments.
Good Bad Ugly is a passable film at best catering mainly to senior hero Ajith fans but offering little in terms of story substance or cinematic highs for others, according to one detailed review. Another critic described it as a star-studded action film high on nostalgia and fan service but low on logic and story, highlighting the fundamental disconnect between entertainment value and narrative coherence.
The film has been particularly criticized for its excessive focus on fan service at the expense of storytelling quality, with multiple reviews pointing out that it works primarily as a vehicle for Ajith Kumar’s screen presence rather than as a well-crafted cinematic experience.
Box Office Performance
Despite mixed critical reception, Good Bad Ugly has achieved remarkable commercial success. The film crossed the ₹150 crore milestone within the first 4 days at the worldwide box office, demonstrating strong audience interest. It emerged as the highest grossing Tamil film of 2025, even surpassing the lifetime business of Ajith’s 2022 film Valimai with a gross of ₹180 crore worldwide within a week.
The film’s box office collection in Tamil Nadu crossed ₹109 crore in 11 days, with an estimated gross of ₹136 crore, showcasing particularly strong performance in its home territory. This commercial success validates the film’s appeal to its target audience, primarily consisting of Ajith Kumar’s dedicated fanbase and mass entertainment seekers.
What Works and What Doesn’t
Strengths:
- Ajith Kumar’s commanding screen presence and fan appeal
- Strong box office performance indicating audience connect
- Effective background score in action sequences
- Decent supporting performances, particularly from Arjun Das
- High production values and technical competence
Areas for Improvement:
- Weak narrative structure prioritizing fan service over storytelling
- Underwhelming original soundtrack compositions
- Repetitive elevation sequences and hero shots
- Limited appeal beyond the established fanbase
- Lack of cohesive script development
- Over-reliance on nostalgia and references to past films
Popular Website Reviews and Public Reception
Various entertainment websites have provided mixed to negative assessments. 123Telugu.com rated the film 2.75/5, indicating below-average quality despite acknowledging Ajith’s screen presence. User reviews on platforms like IMDb reflect a polarized response, with fans appreciating the mass entertainment elements while general audiences find the film lacking in substance.
User feedback on IMDb includes comments like Only Ajith sir presence makes film to watch. Unnecessary elevation shots and irrelevant references and songs with movie. Only fans can watch this movie, perfectly encapsulating the divide between fan appreciation and general audience reception.
Final Verdict
Good Bad Ugly represents a classic example of contemporary commercial Tamil cinema that prioritizes star appeal over narrative substance. While it succeeds in delivering the mass entertainment experience that Ajith Kumar’s fanbase expects, it falls short of creating a universally appealing cinematic experience. The film’s commercial success demonstrates the continued power of star-driven content in Tamil cinema, even when critical reception remains lukewarm.
For moviegoers seeking high-octane action sequences, familiar commercial elements, and Ajith Kumar’s screen charisma, Good Bad Ugly delivers adequately. However, those looking for innovative storytelling, memorable music, or substantial character development may find themselves disappointed. The film ultimately serves its intended purpose as a fan-service vehicle while missing the opportunity to create something genuinely memorable for broader audiences.